The government has clearly defined who deserves alternative housing in the old rent file and who does not… and it said it explicitly: in 5 categories, she will not have a final right to alternative housing.
The first case: anyone who proves that he is the owner of a second residential unit suitable for habitation, meaning he already has an apartment in which he lives.
The second case: the one who sublet the apartment or gave it up to someone else, because the original relationship changed.
The third case: anyone who provides false information or tampers with official documents, exclusion here is immediate and without discussion.
The fourth case: whose monthly income is higher than the limit set by the government, because alternative housing is mainly provided for those who are unable.
Fifth case: Any case whose rental relationship legally ended, before the issuance of the new legislation, and this will not be included among those entitled.
I mean, alternative housing is not for all people.. It is directed to specific groups with clear conditions.. In order for the support to reach those who really need it, are these conditions fair or are there cases that need an exception?
