Early results leaked from the Geekbench platform reveal a first glimpse of the performance of the upcoming iPhone 17e, which is expected to run on the new A19 processor.
These results come after preliminary tests appeared on a number of other Apple devices, such as the iPad Air with an M4 processor and the M5 Max chip, in addition to the MacBook Neo.
However, it should be noted that Geekbench scores for unannounced devices should be taken with caution, as they may not reflect the final performance when the device is released on the market.
According to the recorded results, the A19 processor in the iPhone 17e achieved an average of about 3320 points in the single-core test, and 8373 points in the multi-core test.
Individual test results varied; The single-core scores ranged between 3001 and 3607 points, while the multi-core scores ranged between 6657 and 9241 points, which makes an accurate comparison with other devices indeterminate at the present time.
When looking at the average performance, it is clear that the phone is slightly superior to the iPhone 16e equipped with the A18 processor, which scored 3241 points in the single-core test, and is also ahead by only one point over the iPhone 16 equipped with the A19 processor, which scored 3319 points.
As for the multi-core test, the iPhone 17e scored an average of 8,373 points, outperforming the iPhone 16e, which scored 7,977 points, as well as the iPhone 16 Plus, which scored 8,266 points, and the iPhone 16, which scored 8,280 points.
Regarding the Metal graphics test, four results have appeared so far, ranging between 30,831 and 31,597 points, with an average of 31,163 points.
This performance puts the new phone clearly ahead of the iPhone 16e, which scored 23,895 points, in addition to its superiority over the iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Plus, which scored 27,666 and 27,722 points, respectively.
However, the final judgment on the phone’s performance remains postponed until the iPhone 17e is officially released on the market and further tests are conducted by users and reviewers.
